<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chemistry 101&#8211;Mini-Lesson 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/</link>
	<description>...and anarchy ensues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:14:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1838</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1838</guid>
		<description>Hi, Beth,

Glad you found your way to this post.  And sorry for this late reply.  I&#039;ve been totally bulldozed by my deadline.

Meredith Duran has been saving the world in a cape made from pages of the Oxford English Dictionary, that&#039;s where she has been all your life.  :-)

Lol, the novella.  Let&#039;s worry about when it will be published when it&#039;s been finished for shopping around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Beth,</p>
<p>Glad you found your way to this post.  And sorry for this late reply.  I&#8217;ve been totally bulldozed by my deadline.</p>
<p>Meredith Duran has been saving the world in a cape made from pages of the Oxford English Dictionary, that&#8217;s where she has been all your life.  <img src='http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Lol, the novella.  Let&#8217;s worry about when it will be published when it&#8217;s been finished for shopping around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1814</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1814</guid>
		<description>Forgive me for coming to this so late...but THANK YOU! :) I&#039;ve been (at last, after a long, busy hiatus) catching up on my favorite blogs this morning and discovered your marvelous posts on chemistry. Again, thank you for deciding to delve into this. It&#039;s not only a fascinating topic, well-explicated by you, but it has also introduced me to some fine writers. (Meredith Duran, where have you been all my life?)

And I&#039;m excited to discover this excerpt from your SF novella; when will it be published?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forgive me for coming to this so late&#8230;but THANK YOU! <img src='http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;ve been (at last, after a long, busy hiatus) catching up on my favorite blogs this morning and discovered your marvelous posts on chemistry. Again, thank you for deciding to delve into this. It&#8217;s not only a fascinating topic, well-explicated by you, but it has also introduced me to some fine writers. (Meredith Duran, where have you been all my life?)</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m excited to discover this excerpt from your SF novella; when will it be published?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1698</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1698</guid>
		<description>Oh, Janine, that is so true!  And she expressed it beautifully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Janine, that is so true!  And she expressed it beautifully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherry Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1697</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherry Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 14:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1697</guid>
		<description>Hi Etirv,

Thanks.  Glad the post was of some use to you.  

I&#039;m actually not a very analytical reader myself.  I much prefer to just get sucked in and pulled along and emerge at last with a &quot;Phew&quot; of happiness.  When I write, I also don&#039;t think very hard along technical lines.  And as I noted in the post, this particular insight actually came from Janine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Etirv,</p>
<p>Thanks.  Glad the post was of some use to you.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m actually not a very analytical reader myself.  I much prefer to just get sucked in and pulled along and emerge at last with a &#8220;Phew&#8221; of happiness.  When I write, I also don&#8217;t think very hard along technical lines.  And as I noted in the post, this particular insight actually came from Janine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janine</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1695</link>
		<dc:creator>Janine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1695</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I think Janine might say I did pretty well in setting up this conflict.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Yes, I do think you did a great job.

I was watching Charlie Rose last night and he was interviewing the French actress Juliette Binoche, and asking about the different men she had been involved with.  Binoche made a very astute comments that relates to this discussion, and since I&#039;ve found the transcript online,&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10601#frame_top&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; I&#039;ll quote from the relevant part.  

&lt;blockquote&gt;JULIETTE BINOCHE:  No, no, but what I wanted to say, actually, is it`s about, in a couple, is that you actually -- why do we go back to it is that it reaches an intimacy that it doesn`t reach in an another relationship where there`s not, let`s say a physical relationship or intimate relationship.

And I think that each time we go back to it, because there`s a sort of interaction inside ourselves that we can only reach because of the other. That`s what I believe.  

And it`s actually more about being in touch with the depth of 
ourselves or the hidden place of ourselves that we want so much to be with the other, because I don`t think it`s about the other.  Do you see what I&#039;m saying?  

CHARLIE ROSE:  It`s your own what?  

JULIETTE BINOCHE:  It`s because you get in touch with places that you`ve never been in touch with before you met the person.  So that`s why it`s unbearable sometimes, that`s why it`s so wonderful sometimes, that why it`s -- because you`re reaching different spaces inside you.  &lt;/blockquote&gt;

The whole interview was great BTW, but this particular comment really resonated with me because I think it&#039;s so true, and part of what makes the best romances so good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I think Janine might say I did pretty well in setting up this conflict.</p></blockquote>
<p>Yes, I do think you did a great job.</p>
<p>I was watching Charlie Rose last night and he was interviewing the French actress Juliette Binoche, and asking about the different men she had been involved with.  Binoche made a very astute comments that relates to this discussion, and since I&#8217;ve found the transcript online,<a href="http://www.charlierose.com/view/interview/10601#frame_top" rel="nofollow">here</a> I&#8217;ll quote from the relevant part.  </p>
<blockquote><p>JULIETTE BINOCHE:  No, no, but what I wanted to say, actually, is it`s about, in a couple, is that you actually &#8212; why do we go back to it is that it reaches an intimacy that it doesn`t reach in an another relationship where there`s not, let`s say a physical relationship or intimate relationship.</p>
<p>And I think that each time we go back to it, because there`s a sort of interaction inside ourselves that we can only reach because of the other. That`s what I believe.  </p>
<p>And it`s actually more about being in touch with the depth of<br />
ourselves or the hidden place of ourselves that we want so much to be with the other, because I don`t think it`s about the other.  Do you see what I&#8217;m saying?  </p>
<p>CHARLIE ROSE:  It`s your own what?  </p>
<p>JULIETTE BINOCHE:  It`s because you get in touch with places that you`ve never been in touch with before you met the person.  So that`s why it`s unbearable sometimes, that`s why it`s so wonderful sometimes, that why it`s &#8212; because you`re reaching different spaces inside you.  </p></blockquote>
<p>The whole interview was great BTW, but this particular comment really resonated with me because I think it&#8217;s so true, and part of what makes the best romances so good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etirv</title>
		<link>http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/2009/09/15/chemistry-101-mini-lesson-1/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>etirv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sherrythomas.com/blog/?p=522#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Aloha Sherry!  

I&#039;m not a creative or romance writer but I learned something from your Chemistry 101 post, thanks.  I&#039;m very selective about what I read and when I read historical romances, I really don&#039;t analyze them --- I just enjoy the story and the characters and I love it when romances make me teary-eyed.  But I&#039;ll probably be more mindful about certain elements next time.

By the way, thanks for answering my question on Romantic Crush Junkies!  Chinese Moms are the best!  And I&#039;m glad you&#039;re not writing about the Cultural Revolution!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha Sherry!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not a creative or romance writer but I learned something from your Chemistry 101 post, thanks.  I&#8217;m very selective about what I read and when I read historical romances, I really don&#8217;t analyze them &#8212; I just enjoy the story and the characters and I love it when romances make me teary-eyed.  But I&#8217;ll probably be more mindful about certain elements next time.</p>
<p>By the way, thanks for answering my question on Romantic Crush Junkies!  Chinese Moms are the best!  And I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re not writing about the Cultural Revolution!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
