{"id":118,"date":"2006-12-12T15:16:00","date_gmt":"2006-12-12T21:16:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/2006\/12\/12\/space-opera\/"},"modified":"2009-05-02T09:38:53","modified_gmt":"2009-05-02T15:38:53","slug":"space-opera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/2006\/12\/12\/space-opera\/","title":{"rendered":"Space Opera!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve told a whole lot of people about this, but I got into writing to write what was then called \u201cfuturistic romances.\u201d  I was going to redefine the subgenre the way Professor Tolkien redefined fantasy.<\/p>\n<p>[Crickets chirping]<\/p>\n<p>Okay, so I haven\u2019t done it.  Here\u2019s why.<\/p>\n<p>Back in the middle of the second Clinton Administration, during a period of ardent personal ignorance in the ways of the (publishing) world, I had the whole thing planned.  I\u2019d write one\u2014count that\u2014one historical romance.  Then, once I had my foot in the door, I\u2019d switch to futuristics.  Woo hoo, the first step in Sherry\u2019s Grand Strategy for World Domination.<\/p>\n<p>Remember the Improbability Drive from THE HITCHHIKER\u2019S GUIDE TO THE GALAXY?  If I could build a star drive that runs on naivet\u00e9 and wishful thinking, I\u2019d be halfway to Alpha Centauri already. <\/p>\n<p>When I learned that once you publish in a subgenre, people kind of want you to keep writing it, I clutched my heart.  I had a special hatred for research that people usually reserved for colonoscopies.  And I never had any ideas for historicals beyond the current work-in-progress.  But somehow, I managed to churn out historicals year in, year out, without my head visibly exploding.  So I said, alright, I\u2019ll write both historicals and science fiction romances.  And wrote only historicals.<\/p>\n<p>But now, times, they be a-changin\u2019.<\/p>\n<p>Last weekend, I sent off a three-chapter proposal to my agent.  Science fiction romances suck in that they require a plot, and I\u2019m weak on plots.  But oh, baby, what freedom after a steady diet of nothing but the Queen\u2019s English all these years.  Here\u2019s my personal favorite snippet from the prologue, where the hero and the heroine were about to engage in, ahem, unmentionable activities:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#3333ff;\">\u201cSay \u2018fuck me,\u2019\u201d he ordered.<br \/>\u201cFuck you,\u201d she replied with equal courtesy.<br \/><\/span><br \/>Halleluiah!  All praise to vulgar vernaculars.  There are no two other words in the English language\u2014with the possible exception of \u201cI\u2019m pregnant\u201d\u2014that pack quite such a wallop.<\/p>\n<p>And this bit, from the first chapter, when our not-quite-amorous lovers reunite after many years.  Watch out for another potent two-word combination.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#3333ff;\">\u201cYou look like shit,\u201d she said.<br \/>He rubbed a knuckle along his jaw.  \u201cAnd feel even worse.  You, on the other hand\u2026\u201d<br \/>He looked her over, once, twice.  \u201cBitch goddess.\u201d<br \/><\/span><br \/>Oh, yes, baby.  Something else you can\u2019t say in a historical.<\/p>\n<p>I already write dark, powerful heroines in my historical romances.  I hope science fiction romances would allow me the freedom to make them even darker and more powerful.  The above proposal has just regular human beings.  But I am intrigued by the concept of, say, a genetically modified woman who is physically much stronger than any normal man and made to kill.  What can she do with that strength?  What <em>has<\/em> she done with it?  And what kind of man would have the big, brass balls required to go up against her? <\/p>\n<p>Hmmm.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"color:#993399;\">Update in the Mighty Struggle for a Good Shag:  I have found The Way.  But alas, The Way will require even more rewrites than originally scheduled.  In fact, The Way changes the whole dynamic of the story.  Forget short hiatuses.  I am taking a medium hiatus from the blog to devote the rest of December to DELICIOUS.  So have a great, memorable holiday, everyone.  See you in 2007.<br \/> <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I don\u2019t think I\u2019ve told a whole lot of people about this, but I got into writing to write what was then called \u201cfuturistic romances.\u201d I was going to redefine the subgenre the way Professor Tolkien redefined fantasy. [Crickets chirping] Okay, so I haven\u2019t done it. Here\u2019s why. Back in the middle of the second &#8230; <a title=\"Space Opera!\" class=\"read-more\" href=\"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/2006\/12\/12\/space-opera\/\" aria-label=\"More on Space Opera!\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[57],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=118"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":269,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/118\/revisions\/269"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.sherrythomas.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}